Interesting case of incidental diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by endobronchial ultrasonography

  1. Ananta Subedi 1 , 2,
  2. Rakshya Sharma 1 , 2 and
  3. Fady Jamous 1 , 3
  1. 1 Internal Medicine, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
  2. 2 Hospital Medicine, Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
  3. 3 Pulmonary & Sleep Medicine, Avera Medical Group, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ananta Subedi; ananta2226@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:23 Dec 2022
First published:30 Dec 2022
Online issue publication:30 Dec 2022

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the obstruction of the pulmonary artery or its branches, usually by a thrombus that originates in the lower extremity veins. PE is associated with high mortality risk. Here, we present the case of a patient who initially presented with dysphagia. Chest radiography revealed a lung nodule. Endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) was performed to evaluate the nodule, which revealed a pulmonary embolus. Subsequently, CT angiography of the chest was performed to confirm the diagnosis of PE. Anticoagulation therapy was initiated. The biopsy results were positive for lung adenocarcinoma. There are only few reported cases of PE diagnosed using EBUS. Here, the patient had not presented with the signs and symptoms of PE. Had PE not been diagnosed by EBUS, our patient could have potentially had a disastrous outcome. Moreover, this case shows that EBUS may be used for diagnosing PE.

Background

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the obstruction of the pulmonary arteries or their branches by a material, most commonly a thrombus that originates elsewhere in the body. PE is the third most common cause of mortality from cardiovascular causes, after coronary disease and stroke.1 2 Untreated PE can carry a significant mortality risk, especially in patients with malignancy or in patients presenting with signs of right heart strain.3–5

Here, we present the case of a man in his 40s who was referred to the pulmonology clinic for the evaluation of a lung nodule discovered incidentally during a dysphagia workup. Endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) revealed findings suggestive of PE. EBUS is not a modality used to diagnose PE. Therefore, the diagnosis was confirmed using chest CT angiography (CTA). Anticoagulation therapy was initiated. The patient had no classic signs and symptoms of PE, and the diagnosis would have been easily missed. PE was diagnosed during EBUS, which resulted in prompt treatment and helped avoid further complications.

Case presentation

A man in his 40s with no significant medical history, except coronavirus disease in 2020, was referred to our pulmonology clinic for the evaluation of a right upper lobe lung nodule. Two weeks before presentation, the patient developed discomfort while swallowing, which he described as a pressure sensation. There was no odynophagia or a feeling of food getting stuck. A week later, he developed dry cough and wheezing. He felt pressure during deep breathing. He denied chest pain, chest tightness, dyspnoea or haemoptysis. There was no history of aspiration, fever, chills, seizures or weight loss. The patient had no history of smoking. He also developed calf pain. He visited his primary care physician who performed chest radiography, which revealed abnormal peribronchial and interstitial thickening of the right lung and septal lines in the periphery. There was a 9×4 mm nodule over the right upper lobe. Chest CT showed a 2.1 cm nodule in the superior aspect of the right lower lobe, which was lobulated and spiculated and showed mediastinal and hilar adenopathy. Small pleural effusion, peribronchial interlobular septal thickening, pleural thickening and interstitial markings were noted in the right lower lobe. Lower extremity Doppler was also performed and was negative for deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

On physical examination, the patient’s vital signs were within the normal limits. He was not in any distress. He had no thyromegaly and tenderness of the neck. There was no lymphadenopathy in the neck and supraclavicular area. On auscultation of the chest, an end-expiratory wheeze was heard on the right side during forced expiration, but no crackles. The findings of cardiac examination were unremarkable. The abdomen was non-distended, soft and non-tender with no palpable organomegaly.

The differential diagnoses at this point were broad and included inflammation, infection and malignancy. The patient was offered the option of empiric antibiotics with short-term follow-up or positron emission tomography (PET) CT. The decision was made for PET CT, which was performed the next week and showed a hypermetabolic right lower lobe nodule, hypermetabolic mediastinal adenopathy, right hilar adenopathy and hypermetabolic bone lesions in the right clavicle and sternum. The findings were concerning for a neoplastic aetiology; however, an infectious aetiology could not be excluded. These findings necessitated bronchoscopy and EBUS.

A week later, bronchoscopy with transbronchial needle aspiration, brushing, endobronchial biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and EBUS was were performed. Airway inspection revealed mild diffuse erythema and thickening of the airway mucosa on the right side. Extrinsic compression of the right lower lobe subsegments was observed. Left EBUS revealed a thrombus in the left pulmonary artery (figure 1). Endobronchial biopsy of the lymph nodes was also performed. Because of the findings suggestive of PE, the patient was hospitalised for further workup and management.

Figure 1

EBUS with colour Doppler and EBUS showing a pulmonary embolus in the left pulmonary artery. EBUS, endobronchial ultrasonography.

Investigations

On hospital admission, his vital signs were stable, and his physical examination findings were unchanged.

The complete blood count was unremarkable. Serum electrolytes and the renal function test results were within the normal limits. Serum troponin was negative. Chest CTA showed filling defects consistent with acute PE in the right upper and left lower lobes. Extensive ground glass opacities were observed in the bilateral lung fields with right pleural effusion (figure 2). Duplex ultrasound of the lower extremity veins revealed DVT in the bilateral lower extremity veins. This was a new finding compared with the negative duplex ultrasound performed 3 weeks prior. A right thoracentesis was performed. An echocardiogram showed unremarkable findings. He was admitted to the hospital, and continuous cardiac monitoring showed normal sinus rhythm.

Figure 2

Chest CT angiography showing an embolus in the left pulmonary artery. There is also a large right pleural effusion.

Treatment

Anticoagulation therapy was initiated with enoxaparin 1 mg/kg two times per day because at that point it had not yet been ascertained whether the patient could afford the more expensive direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy. On discharge, enoxaparin was stopped, and apixaban was started at 10 mg two times per day for a week, followed by 5 mg two times per day.

Outcome and follow-up

A 1-week follow-up was recommended, and by then, the findings of the endobronchial biopsy, BAL and thoracentesis were available. Pleural fluid cytology and right endobronchial biopsy were positive for adenocarcinoma. The subcarinal, right lower paratracheal and right interlobar lymph nodes were positive for adenocarcinoma of lung origin. The patient was referred to the oncology clinic. At the time of writing, he is undergoing chemotherapy. Anticoagulation therapy was continued indefinitely. The patient had no DVT or PE complications.

Discussion

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) includes DVT and PE. It is estimated that thromboembolism causes approximately a quarter of deaths worldwide,2 and in the USA, PE accounts for approximately 100 000 deaths annually.4 According to the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER), the PE-associated mortality rate at 3 months was 17.4%.3 The primary causes of thrombosis, as described by Virchow’s triad, are abnormalities in the blood, blood stasis and injury to the vessel wall. A thrombus originating in the deep veins of the lower extremities is the most common cause of PE.6 DVT was detected in almost 50% of patients with PE in the ICOPER.3 Malignancy, which is considered a hypercoagulable state due to the production of substances with procoagulant activity, is a known risk factor for VTE. In one study, 18% of VTE cases were attributed to an active malignancy.6 VTE can precede the diagnosis of cancer and vice versa.7

Clinical probability assessment is usually employed in PE diagnosis to identify patients at intermediate-risk or high-risk probabilities. The patients with suspected PE are stratified into groups of expected prevalence using scoring systems such as Wells’ score.8 Wells’ score incorporates several history and physical examination factors to aid in categorising patients into low-probability, intermediate-probability and high-probability groups. A negative D-dimer test result can be used to rule out VTE in low-risk and moderate-risk patients. CTA is the gold-standard test to diagnose PE and is used, when possible, in high-risk patients and in low-risk to moderate-risk patients with a positive serum d-dimer test. If CTA cannot be performed for various reasons, such as renal failure, allergy to the contrast material, and contraindication for radiation exposure, a ventilation-perfusion scan and ultrasound duplex of the lower extremities are also considered.9

Anticoagulation therapy is the mainstay of treatment for PE. DOACs, such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, are the preferred anticoagulant agents for low-risk patients as described by a lower Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score of classes I and II or if there is no evidence of right ventricular dysfunction. Intermediate-risk patients with PESI scores of class III or IV, or patients who demonstrate right ventricular dysfunction are usually hospitalised and treated with oral or parenteral anticoagulation. Patients demonstrating haemodynamic instability can be treated with primary reperfusion methods such as systemic thrombolysis if there is no contraindication. In unstable patients with contraindications to thrombolysis, if expertise is available, surgical embolectomy or percutaneous catheter-directed thrombolysis are alternate reperfusion options.5 10

EBUS is a modality that incorporates endoscopic images obtained by bronchoscopy with an ultrasound probe to obtain sonographic images through the airway wall. It is used to evaluate mediastinal lesions, such as mediastinal nodes and masses, and to obtain tissue samples. EBUS is widely used for transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes and for diagnosing and staging lung cancer. During EBUS, the operator also assesses the major vessels, such as the aorta, pulmonary arteries and their branches, and superior vena cava, which are located close to the central airways. An intraluminal thrombus in the vessels can be easily detected using the colour Doppler mode. However, only few cases of PE diagnosed using EBUS have been reported.11 A study of 32 cases reported that EBUS is comparable to CTA for PE diagnosis.12 However, larger, blinded and comparative studies are needed to better evaluate its use as the primary diagnostic tool for PE diagnosis. A recent meta-analysis reported a specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% for PE when a ventricular thrombus was detected on an echocardiogram.13 If similar specificity and PPV are seen for the ultrasonic visualisation of thrombi in the pulmonary vasculature using EBUS, it could allow for confirmation of pulmonary emboli. This could be useful for patients with contraindications to CTA and those who have an alternate diagnosis that requires bronchoscopy. However, this will also require further studies for confirmation.

Because EBUS is invasive and requires a highly skilled operator, it cannot replace CTA as the gold standard for diagnosing PE. However, in cases where CTA cannot be performed for various reasons as mentioned earlier and where bronchoscopy may be indicated for another concurrent diagnosis, EBUS can be a feasible alternative.

In our case, the patient underwent a workup to evaluate a lung nodule incidentally seen on a chest radiograph, performed to evaluate dysphagia. He also had calf pain; however, ultrasound venous duplex of the bilateral lower extremities was initially negative for DVT. Chest CT was performed without contrast, which showed a lung nodule, pleural effusion, and mediastinal and hilar adenopathy. The workup was appropriately progressing towards the diagnosis of lung cancer, but VTE was missed. If no thrombosis had been detected in the EBUS, VTE would have been completely unnoticed, which could have had disastrous consequences. Moreover, the thrombus diagnosis during EBUS prompted hospitalisation and accelerated the workup for lung cancer diagnosis.

Learning points

  • Thromboembolism, which includes pulmonary embolism (PE), is one of the the most common cardiovascular causes of mortality. The risk of thromboembolism is higher in patients with malignancy than in the background patient population.

  • The diagnosis of PE can be easily missed. PE can present with non-specific symptoms and may even be asymptomatic. Early diagnosis and treatment of PE are of paramount importance.

  • CT angiography (CTA) of the chest is the current gold-standard method for diagnosing PE. If CTA cannot be performed and bronchoscopy is indicated for another concurrent diagnosis, endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) may be a feasible alternative to diagnose PE. Moreover, routine examination of the pulmonary vessels during EBUS in patients with suspected malignancy may aid in detecting accompanying pulmonary emboli.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Footnotes

  • Twitter @anan2u

  • Contributors AS reviewed the literature and wrote the entire manuscript. RS helped AS in writing the manuscript. FJ is the preceptor who did the endobronchial ultrasound procedure mentioned in the case report and also helped the author with supervision and guidance.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer